2005. gada 12.mart\u0101 notika k\u0101rt\u0113j\u0101s pa\u0161vald\u012bbu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas. PCTVL \u0161aj\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s start\u0113ja 20 Latvijas pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101s. T\u0101dej\u0101di tika p\u0101rsp\u0113ts 2001. gada rezult\u0101ts, kad daudz labv\u0113l\u012bg\u0101kos \u0101r\u0113jos apst\u0101k\u013cos (praktiski nebija konkurences starp “krievu partij\u0101m”) apvien\u012bbas saraksti tika izvirz\u012bti tikai 12 pils\u0113t\u0101s. \u0160oreiz ar iniciat\u012bvu veidot savus sarakstus pils\u0113t\u0101s un pagastos uzst\u0101j\u0101s p\u0101rsvar\u0101 viet\u0113jie partijas biedri un atbalst\u012bt\u0101ji. Priek\u0161v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu kampa\u0146as gait\u0101 partijas vad\u012bbai nen\u0101c\u0101s m\u0101ksl\u012bgi organiz\u0113t deput\u0101tu kandid\u0101tu \u201cra\u0161anos\u201d.<\/p>\n
P\u0101rvar\u0113dama 2002.-2003. gadu \u0161\u0137el\u0161an\u0101s un nodev\u012bbas, pret Izgl\u012bt\u012bbas reformu v\u0113rsto masu protesta akciju laik\u0101 (2003.-2004.g.g.) atjaunojot un nostiprinot uztic\u012bbu sev, PCTVL skaidri pozicion\u0113ja sevi k\u0101 Latvijas krievvalod\u012bg\u0101s kopienas pamatpartija, kura mor\u0101li p\u0101rsp\u0113j visas p\u0101r\u0113j\u0101s valsts krievu un kreis\u0101s partijas. Gan draugi, gan ienaidnieki atzina PCTVL stabilit\u0101ti. Nacion\u0101laj\u0101 l\u012bmen\u012b \u0161\u012b partija k\u013cuva par valsts politisk\u0101 spektra notur\u012bgo da\u013cu. <\/p>\n
Pa\u0161ai partijai apst\u0101k\u013ci, kuri izveidoj\u0101s \u0161aj\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s, bija visai cer\u012bgi. Pag\u0101ju\u0161o gadu masu protesta akcijas iesaist\u012bja politik\u0101 iev\u0113rojamu daudzumu god\u012bgu un apd\u0101vin\u0101tu cilv\u0113ku. Vi\u0146i iedvesa jaunus sp\u0113kus daudz\u0101s re\u0123ion\u0101laj\u0101s noda\u013c\u0101s. Tom\u0113r bija ar\u012b zaud\u0113jumi. Pak\u013caujoties nacion\u0101listisk\u0101s preses spiedienam, vald\u012bba atteic\u0101s pie\u0161\u0137irt pilson\u012bbu Jurijam Petropavlovskim (partijas Valdes loceklim un pretreformas masu protesta akciju organiz\u0113t\u0101jam). Atteikums pie\u0161\u0137irt pilson\u012bbu n\u0101ca p\u0113c div\u0101m ned\u0113\u013c\u0101m, kuras pag\u0101ja kop\u0161 br\u012b\u017ea, kad PCTVL izvirz\u012bja Juriju k\u0101 kandid\u0101tu galvaspils\u0113tas m\u0113ra amatam. Petropavlovskis nesp\u0113ja piedal\u012bties v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s, kas zin\u0101m\u0101 m\u0113r\u0101 pav\u0101jin\u0101ja PCTVL R\u012bgas sarakstu. <\/p>\n
Otrais negat\u012bvais faktors izveidoj\u0101s PCTVL sp\u0113ku p\u0101rv\u0113rt\u0113\u0161anas rezult\u0101t\u0101. Ietekm\u012bg\u0101s krievu av\u012bzes aicin\u0101ja v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jus sadal\u012bt savas balsis, lai R\u012bgas dom\u0113 b\u016btu p\u0101rst\u0101v\u0113tas gan PCTVL, gan TSP, gan \u201cJaunais Centrs\u201d. Par aksiomu tika pie\u0146emts apgalvojums, ka PCTVL jebkur\u0101 gad\u012bjum\u0101 sasniegs labus rezult\u0101tus un t\u0101d\u0113\u013c tai nav vajadz\u012bgs \u012bpa\u0161s atbalsts. Preses aicin\u0101jums dezorient\u0113ja v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jus, rezult\u0101t\u0101 partija zaud\u0113ja da\u013cu no bals\u012bm. <\/p>\n
2005. gada v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s visos PCTVL sarakstos bija iek\u013cauti tikai partijas biedri. Iz\u0146\u0113mums bija Liep\u0101jas pils\u0113ta, kur PCTVL sarakst\u0101 tika iek\u013cauti da\u017ei kandid\u0101ti, kurus rekomend\u0113ja Latvijas Nacion\u0101li Demokr\u0101tisk\u0101 partija. Neskatoties uz negat\u012bv\u0101m prognoz\u0113m, Liep\u0101jas kop\u012bg\u0101 priek\u0161v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu kampa\u0146a izr\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s par vienu no veiksm\u012bg\u0101k\u0101m un rezultat\u012bv\u0101k\u0101m 2005. gada re\u0123ion\u0101lo kampa\u0146u vid\u016b.<\/p>\n
2005. gada v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s par PCTVL pamatkonkurentiem k\u013cuva Dolgopolova partija \u201cJaunais Centrs\u201d, Tautas saska\u0146as partija un apvien\u012bba \u201cDzimtene\u201d\/Latvijas Soci\u0101listisk\u0101 partija. \u0100rpus R\u012bgas PCTVL n\u0101c\u0101s konkur\u0113t ar\u012b ar re\u0123ion\u0101laj\u0101m partij\u0101m. Latvijas Pirm\u0101s partijas (\u201cm\u0101c\u012bt\u0101ju partijas\u201d) saraksts, neskatoties uz ba\u017e\u0101m, nesp\u0113ja nopietni konkur\u0113t ar krievu un kreisaj\u0101m partij\u0101m. Kaut ar\u012b LPP atbalst\u012bja k\u0101da da\u013ca no krievu gar\u012bdzniekiem, \u0161\u012b partija nesp\u0113ja k\u013c\u016bt par sav\u0113jo krievu v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jiem, tai skait\u0101 ar\u012b tic\u012bgajiem. Iesp\u0113jams, ka da\u013cu no Latvijas krievu tic\u012bgajiem pilso\u0146iem (kuri p\u0101rsvar\u0101 ir pareiztic\u012bgie un vectic\u012bbnieki) atbaid\u012bja Latvijas Pirm\u0101s partijas \u201csektantu dominante\u201d (jauno protestantisma konfesiju p\u0101rst\u0101vju p\u0101rsvars). <\/p>\n
PCTVL konkurentu stipr\u0101 puse bija nesal\u012bdzin\u0101mi liel\u0101ks priek\u0161v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu bud\u017eets un administrat\u012bvais resurss (Dolgopolova partija, re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s partijas), k\u0101 ar\u012b jebk\u0101du likuma un mor\u0101les robe\u017eu p\u0101rk\u0101p\u0161ana, izmantojot personisk\u0101s radiostacijas rekl\u0101mas iesp\u0113jas (Jurija \u017durav\u013cova partija \u201cDzimtene\u201d). Turkl\u0101t, da\u017e\u0101s pils\u0113t\u0101s, tai skait\u0101 R\u0113zekn\u0113 un J\u016brmal\u0101, bija fiks\u0113ta v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ju balsu masu uzpirk\u0161ana, kuru organiz\u0113ja Dolgopolova partijas viet\u0113jie akt\u012bvisti. \u0160aj\u0101s pils\u0113t\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101ti tika p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ti ties\u0101, kas noveda, piem\u0113ram, R\u0113zekn\u0113 pie jaunu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu datuma noteik\u0161anas. Par rupjiem likuma p\u0101rk\u0101pumiem, kuri bija pielaisti priek\u0161v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu kampa\u0146\u0101s gait\u0101, tika sod\u012bta ar\u012b raidstacija \u201cPIK\u201d, kas pieder J. \u017durav\u013covam.<\/p>\n
Visum\u0101 2005. gada pa\u0161vald\u012bbu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101ti apvien\u012bbai PCTVL bija labv\u0113l\u012bgi. R\u012bgas dom\u0113 partija pusotras reizes palielin\u0101ja savu p\u0101rst\u0101vniec\u012bbu. PCTVL deput\u0101ti tika iev\u0113l\u0113ti 18 pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101s no 20. <\/p>\n
2005. gada pa\u0161vald\u012bbu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101ti apkopoti <\/p>\n
sekojo\u0161aj\u0101 tabul\u0101 ( sal\u012bdzin\u0101jum\u0101 ar iepriek\u0161\u0113jiem gadiem).<\/p>\n
* <\/STRONG>Tabul\u0101 nor\u0101d\u012btas tikai t\u0101s pa\u0161vald\u012bbas, kur\u0101s PCTVL <\/STRONG>piedal\u012bj\u0101s 2001. un 2005. gadu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s.<\/p>\n ** \u0160aj\u0101s pils\u0113t\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101ti tika p\u0101rs\u016bdz\u0113ti ties\u0101.<\/p>\n <\/STRONG><\/p>\n PCTVL<\/STRONG> pamatkonkurentu pan\u0101kumi bija daudz pietic\u012bg\u0101ki. Tot\u0101ls zaud\u0113jums v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s piemekl\u0113ja Tautas Saska\u0146as partiju. Neskatoties uz to, ka R\u012bg\u0101 par TSP saraksta \u201clokomot\u012bvi\u201d bija daudzgad\u012bgais saskanie\u0161u l\u012bderis J\u0101nis Jurk\u0101ns, partija nep\u0101rvar\u0113ja piecu procentu barjeru un neieguva p\u0101rst\u0101vniec\u012bbu galvaspils\u0113tas pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101. TSP t\u0101 ar\u012b neizdev\u0101s p\u0101rvar\u0113t kr\u012bzi, kuru izsauca nodev\u012bg\u0101 izst\u0101\u0161an\u0101s no PCTVL<\/STRONG> un pret krievu skolu Izgl\u012bt\u012bbas reformu v\u0113rsto akciju sabot\u0101\u017ea.<\/p>\n Partija \u201cJaunais Centrs\u201d R\u012bg\u0101 p\u0101rvar\u0113ja piecu procentu barjeru, bet no t\u0101s tika iev\u0113l\u0113ti tikai 5 deput\u0101ti. \u0160is rezult\u0101ts absol\u016bti neatbilda izt\u0113r\u0113to l\u012bdzek\u013cu daudzumam, bet galvenais noz\u012bm\u0113ja, ka izg\u0101z\u0101s pl\u0101ni izveidot nopietnu starpnacion\u0101lo latvie\u0161u un krievu \u201csoci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101 virziena pragmati\u0137u\u201d partiju, kuru sol\u012bja v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jiem Dolgopolovs. P\u0113c \u0161\u012bs partijas saraksta netika iev\u0113l\u0113ts neviens deput\u0101ts ar latvie\u0161u uzv\u0101rdu, bet divi no iev\u0113l\u0113tajiem k\u013cuva slaveni pateicoties dal\u012bbai kampa\u0146\u0101 par krievu skolu saglab\u0101\u0161anu. Tas noz\u012bm\u0113, ka par \u201cJauno Centru\u201d balsoja v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ji, kuri at\u0161\u0137\u012br\u0101s no PCTVL<\/STRONG> v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jiem nevis ideolo\u0123iski, bet gan ar person\u012bgo uztic\u0113\u0161anos Sergejam Dolgopolovam k\u0101 R\u012bgas vicem\u0113ram un \u201cm\u0113renajam politi\u0137im\u201d.<\/p>\n Par 2005. gada pa\u0161vald\u012bbu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu p\u0101rsteigumu k\u013cuva neparedz\u0113tais apvien\u012bbas \u201cDzimtene\u201d\/Latvijas Soci\u0101listisk\u0101 partija pan\u0101kums. Negaid\u012bts \u0161is pan\u0101kums bija ar\u012b sociolo\u0123isko dienestu darbiniekiem un politologiem, jo Rubika\/\u017durav\u013cova v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ji pat v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu priek\u0161vakar\u0101 sl\u0113pa savu izv\u0113li. \u0160\u012b bloka pan\u0101kumu var\u0113tu izskaidrot sekojo\u0161ie faktori: neierobe\u017eota person\u012bg\u0101s raidstacijas rekl\u0101mas iesp\u0113ju izmanto\u0161ana; gal\u0113ji populistisk\u0101, nereti mel\u012bg\u0101 retorika; kumulat\u012bvs efekts, kas tika pan\u0101kts, veidojot divu pamatpartiju un v\u0113l da\u017eu s\u012bko partiju kop\u0113jo sarakstu; Alfr\u0113da Rubika k\u0101 Latvijas komunistu l\u012bdera personisk\u0101 nelokam\u0101 autorit\u0101te; PCTVL<\/STRONG> tradicion\u0101lo v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ju da\u013cas vil\u0161an\u0101s p\u0113c iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101m \u0161\u0137el\u0161an\u0101m un m\u016bsu apvien\u012bbas neveiksm\u0113m. Par \u201cDzimtenes\u201d\/LSP saraksta l\u012bderi R\u012bg\u0101 k\u013cuva Alfr\u0113da Rubika jaun\u0101kais d\u0113ls Art\u016brs, kur\u0161 pirms tam nebija nodarbojies ar politiku. Daudzi v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101ji t\u0101 ar\u012b nesp\u0113ja atmaskot \u0161o viltojumu un balsoja par sarakstu, dom\u0101jot, ka balso par Rubiku vec\u0101ko. Rubika\/\u017durav\u013cova bloks nosp\u0113l\u0113ja \u201copoz\u012bcijas opoz\u012bcijas iek\u0161ien\u0113\u201d lomu \u2013 da\u013ca no v\u0113l\u0113t\u0101jiem, balsojot par ultra populistiem, pauda savu protestu pret PCTVL<\/STRONG>, TSP un \u201c\u201dJauno Centru\u201d \u2013 t\u0101m krievu partij\u0101m, kuras pati tr\u016bc\u012bg\u0101k\u0101 un sadusmot\u0101k\u0101 valsts iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju da\u013ca uztver k\u0101 politisk\u0101s sist\u0113mas (lai ar\u012b opozicion\u0101ro) sast\u0101vda\u013cu, ta\u010du \u0161iem \u013caud\u012bm \u0161\u012b politisk\u0101 sist\u0113ma nav principi\u0101li pie\u0146emama. <\/p>\n Atjaunojot un papla\u0161inot savu p\u0101rst\u0101vniec\u012bbu pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101s 2005. gad\u0101, PCTVL<\/STRONG> nesp\u0113ja piln\u012bb\u0101 piek\u013c\u016bt re\u0101l\u0101s varas svir\u0101m. At\u0161\u0137ir\u012bb\u0101 no nacion\u0101l\u0101 parlamenta l\u012bme\u0146a, kur krievu partiju dal\u012bbai likumdo\u0161anas var\u0101 trauc\u0113 latvisk\u0101s politisk\u0101s elites etniskais egoisms un rasu aizspriedumi, pa\u0161vald\u012bbu l\u012bmen\u012b etniskais faktors neb\u016bt nav iz\u0161\u0137iro\u0161ais. \u0160eit PCTVL<\/STRONG> deput\u0101tu dal\u012bbai valdo\u0161aj\u0101s koal\u012bcij\u0101s trauc\u0113 politisk\u0101s pieredzes tr\u016bkums, jo daudzi no m\u016bsu jauniev\u0113l\u0113tajiem pa\u0161vald\u012bbu deput\u0101tiem ir ide\u0101listisk\u0101 tipa politi\u0137i, kuri pirmo reizi ir ien\u0101ku\u0161i municip\u0101laj\u0101s instit\u016bcij\u0101s ar sen izveidoju\u0161os politisko sp\u0113ku sam\u0113ru. Par laimi, politisk\u0101s pieredzes tr\u016bkums \u2013 probl\u0113ma, kuru ar laiku var p\u0101rvar\u0113t. <\/p>\n Uz kop\u0113j\u0101 fona izdal\u0101s divas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas. Daugavpil\u012b PCTVL<\/STRONG> izdev\u0101s piln\u012bb\u0101 konvert\u0113t sekmes vel\u0113\u0161an\u0101s, p\u0101rv\u0113r\u0161ot t\u0101s par dal\u012bbu var\u0101. M\u016bsu partijas vien\u012bg\u0101 deput\u0101ta balss izr\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s par iz\u0161\u0137iro\u0161o, lai izveidotu stabilu valdo\u0161o koal\u012bciju. Labv\u0113l\u012bgu lomu \u0161eit nosp\u0113l\u0113ja tas, ka partneri uztv\u0113ra m\u016bs, k\u0101 sav\u0101 r\u012bc\u012bb\u0101 prognoz\u0113jamu partiju. Turkl\u0101t re\u0123ion\u0101l\u0101s noda\u013cas vad\u012bt\u0101ji piedal\u012bj\u0101s intens\u012bv\u0101s p\u0101rrun\u0101s. Rezult\u0101t\u0101 PCTVL<\/STRONG> deput\u0101ts Miroslavs Mitrofanovs <\/STRONG>bija iev\u0113l\u0113ts par pils\u0113tas vicem\u0113ru. Valsts v\u0113stur\u0113 tas ir otrais gad\u012bjums, kad PCTVL<\/STRONG> p\u0101rst\u0101vis ie\u0146\u0113ma \u0161\u0101du amatu. Tom\u0113r dr\u012bzum\u0101 KNAB pazi\u0146oja par to, ka M. Mitrofanovs nevar vienlaic\u012bgi ie\u0146emt amatu Daugavpils dom\u0113 un amatu Eiroparlament\u0101. Lai saglab\u0101tu partijai abas poz\u012bcijas, tika pie\u0146emts l\u0113mums nodot vicem\u0113ra amatu un deput\u0101ta mand\u0101tu n\u0101kamajam PCTVL<\/STRONG> saraksta kandid\u0101tam O\u013cegam Tolma\u010dovam<\/STRONG>. M\u016bsu vicem\u0113rs Daugavpils dom\u0113 veic t\u0101du pa\u0161vald\u012bbas funkciju p\u0101rraudz\u012bbu k\u0101 sabiedrisk\u0101 integr\u0101cija, sabiedr\u012bbas inform\u0113\u0161ana un vides vesel\u012bba.<\/p>\n \u012apa\u0161a situ\u0101cija izveidoj\u0101s R\u012bgas dom\u0113. \u0160eit PCTVL<\/STRONG> bija gan iesp\u0113jas, gan nepiecie\u0161am\u0101 pieredze, lai ieietu valdo\u0161aj\u0101 koal\u012bcija. Iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101s domes pilnvaru laik\u0101 (2001.-2005.g.g.) PCTVL<\/STRONG> de fakto bija Latvijas Soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tisk\u0101s Str\u0101dnieku partijas (LSDSP) jaun\u0101k\u0101 partnere. 2005. gad\u0101 izveidojusies politisk\u0101 situ\u0101cija liecin\u0101ja par to, ka R\u012bg\u0101 p\u0113c v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101m var\u0113tu izveidoties valdo\u0161\u0101 koal\u012bcija, kuras sast\u0101v\u0101 b\u016btu \u010detras krievvalod\u012bg\u0101s kopienas partijas \u2013 PCTVL<\/STRONG>, \u201cJaunais Centrs\u201d, TSP, \u201cDzimtene\u201d\/LSP un vien\u012bg\u0101 kreis\u0101 latvie\u0161u partija – LSDSP. V\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu rezult\u0101ti liecin\u0101ja, ka summ\u0101 \u0161\u012b krievu un kreiso koal\u012bcija sa\u0146\u0113ma 29 vietas no 60. T\u0101dej\u0101di, lai ieg\u016btu varu, tai pietr\u016bka tikai divas vietas. \u0160o divu vietu tr\u016bkum\u0101 pirm\u0101m k\u0101rt\u0101m b\u016btu j\u0101vaino soci\u0101ldemokr\u0101tus, kuri sal\u012bdzin\u0101jum\u0101 ar iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101m v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101m zaud\u0113ja 7 deput\u0101tu mand\u0101tus. Otrais v\u0101jais posms krievu un kreiso koal\u012bcij\u0101 izr\u0101d\u012bj\u0101s TSP, kura visp\u0101r nesp\u0113ja p\u0101rvar\u0113t piecu procentu barjeru un kuras v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s ieg\u016bt\u0101s balsis tika sadal\u012btas par labu lab\u0113j\u0101m nacion\u0101listiskaj\u0101m partij\u0101m. P\u0113c tam, kad lab\u0113j\u0101 koal\u012bcija iev\u0113l\u0113ja savu m\u0113ru, lab\u0113jo pus\u0113 p\u0101rg\u0101ja \u201cDzimtene\u201d\/LSP, k\u0101 kompens\u0101ciju par savu \u201cDzimtenes nodev\u012bbu\u201d (k\u0101 to t\u0113laini nosauca \u017eurn\u0101listi) sa\u0146emot Vides komitejas priek\u0161s\u0113d\u0113t\u0101ja amatu.<\/p>\n T\u0101dej\u0101di R\u012bg\u0101 tika sast\u0101d\u012bta lab\u0113j\u0101 pils\u0113tas l\u012bme\u0146a vald\u012bba, kuru atbalst\u012bja \u017durav\u013cova\/Rubika bloka deput\u0101ti, kas bija gatavi tirgot ar saviem principiem. \u0160is rezult\u0101ts nav izdev\u012bgs PCTVL<\/STRONG>, jo tas p\u0101rtrauca pirms \u010detriem gadiem R\u012bgas pa\u0161vald\u012bbas l\u012bmen\u012b uzs\u0101kto krievvalod\u012bg\u0101s kopienas politisko un kadru rehabilit\u0101ciju. Jau pirm\u0101s balso\u0161anas v\u0113sturisk\u0101 mantojuma jaut\u0101jumos (jaut\u0101jums par P\u0113tera I pieminek\u013ca atgrie\u0161anu R\u012bg\u0101) lika neviennoz\u012bm\u012bgi saprast, ka krievvalod\u012bgajai opoz\u012bcijai nav ko cer\u0113t uz \u201cDzimtenes\u201d\/LSP pal\u012bdz\u012bbu – t\u0101s deput\u0101ti balso t\u0101pat k\u0101 vi\u0146u lab\u0113jie partneri. Nen\u0101kas cer\u0113t ar\u012b uz jauno varas instit\u016bciju liber\u0101lo attieksmi, saska\u0146ojot opoz\u012bcijas m\u012bti\u0146us un piketus. Lab\u0113j\u0101 koal\u012bcija daudzu subjekt\u012bvu un objekt\u012bvu iemeslu d\u0113\u013c bremz\u0113 iepriek\u0161\u0113j\u0101s \u201ckreis\u0101s domes\u201d lielm\u0113roga projektu realiz\u0101ciju \u2013 tiltu un municip\u0101lo m\u0101jok\u013cu celtniec\u012bbu.<\/p>\n Tan\u012b pat laik\u0101 lab\u0113j\u0101 vair\u0101kuma poz\u012bcijas nestabilit\u0101te \u013cauj cer\u0113t uz koal\u012bcijas sast\u0101va izmai\u0146\u0101m prognoz\u0113jam\u0101 n\u0101kotn\u0113. Turkl\u0101t tas fakts, ka gan nacion\u0101laj\u0101, gan municip\u0101laj\u0101 l\u012bmen\u012b vara ir koncentr\u0113ta lab\u0113jo rok\u0101s, rada pozit\u012bvus apst\u0101k\u013cus opoz\u012bcijai g\u016bt p\u0101rsp\u0113ku 2006. gada Saeimas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s. Gada laik\u0101, kas pag\u0101ja p\u0113c Latvijas iest\u0101\u0161an\u0101s Eirosavien\u012bb\u0101, liel\u0101k\u0101s iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju da\u013cas dz\u012bves apst\u0101k\u013ci pasliktin\u0101j\u0101s, kas rada labv\u0113l\u012bgu augsni pla\u0161a m\u0113roga neapmierin\u0101t\u012bbai par lab\u0113jo politiku. Gatavojoties 9. Saeimas v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101m, PCTVL <\/STRONG>uzdevums ir pareizi izmantot \u0161o iedz\u012bvot\u0101ju neapmierin\u0101t\u012bbu. Taj\u0101 pat laik\u0101 past\u0101v praktiska nepiecie\u0161am\u012bba neatlaid\u012bgi paaugstin\u0101t PCTVL<\/STRONG> pa\u0161vald\u012bbu deput\u0101tu kompetenci. Rezultat\u012bvs darbs pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101s \u2013 tas ir vien\u012bgais veids k\u0101 pier\u0101d\u012bt gan R\u012bg\u0101, gan re\u0123ionos PCTVL<\/STRONG> k\u0101 politisk\u0101 sp\u0113ka stabilit\u0101ti un r\u012bc\u012bbsp\u0113ju. <\/STRONG> <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" 2005. gada 12.mart\u0101 notika k\u0101rt\u0113j\u0101s pa\u0161vald\u012bbu v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anas. PCTVL \u0161aj\u0101s v\u0113l\u0113\u0161an\u0101s start\u0113ja 20 Latvijas pa\u0161vald\u012bb\u0101s. T\u0101dej\u0101di tika p\u0101rsp\u0113ts 2001. gada rezult\u0101ts, kad daudz labv\u0113l\u012bg\u0101kos \u0101r\u0113jos apst\u0101k\u013cos (praktiski nebija konkurences starp “krievu partij\u0101m”) apvien\u012bbas saraksti tika izvirz\u012bti tikai 12 pils\u0113t\u0101s. \u0160oreiz ar iniciat\u012bvu veidot savus sarakstus pils\u0113t\u0101s un pagastos uzst\u0101j\u0101s p\u0101rsvar\u0101 viet\u0113jie partijas biedri un atbalst\u012bt\u0101ji. Priek\u0161v\u0113l\u0113\u0161anu […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[20,70],"tags":[],"aioseo_notices":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=845"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1516,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/845\/revisions\/1516"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=845"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=845"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/rusojuz.lv\/lv\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=845"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}